RELATED: DisplayPort 2: What's Different, and Why It Matters USB-C: Ideal for Laptop Owners In the future, with the arrival of DisplayPort 2.0, 4K at frame rates of higher than 60 frames in true 10-bit color will be possible, but only on a monitor that supports it.
HDMI, on the other hand, has broader applications, including connecting AV receivers, TVs, and other consumer electronic devices.ĭisplayPort offers some good advantages over HDMI 2.0, but they mostly only apply if you want to daisy-chain multiple monitors. This is primarily because DisplayPort is mostly used for computer-to-monitor connections. Unlike HDMI, DisplayPort lacks any kind of Ethernet support. This means most people will still be using the DisplayPort 1.4 standard, which still stacks up favorably when compared to HDMI 2.0. It’s worth noting, though, DisplayPort 2.0 devices aren’t expected to hit the market until late 2020. While HDMI 2.1 caps out at 48 Gbps, the upcoming DisplayPort 2.0 standard can handle a throughput of 80 Gbps.
#What is the mac mini display port Pc#
DisplayPort: Better, Faster, StrongerĭisplayPort has long been the PC enthusiast’s choice, and, on paper, it’s not hard to see why. If your monitor only supports HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort could provide a better experience in terms of overall features-especially if you want to daisy-chain more than two displays.
If you’re rocking a 4K monitor with HDMI 2.1, you’re unlikely to hit any serious bottlenecks at this stage. These older HDMI 2.0 4K monitors will save you some money, but you’ll also lose out on some features. HDR content is limited to static metadata (the HDR 10 standard) compared to 2.1, which supports dynamic metadata (including HDR10+ and Dolby Vision). For gamers, HDMI 2.0 doesn’t support the FreeSync standard.
0 kommentar(er)
